• chevron_right

      DSA: Google Reports Billions of Deletions on Google Play & Shopping

      news.movim.eu / TorrentFreak · Friday, 8 March - 10:56 · 4 minutes

    ec-droid Late last month we reported on the latest copyright claim data made available by YouTube. In the first half of 2023, YouTube said it processed 980 million Content ID claims , a 25% increase compared to a year earlier.

    Given the upward trajectory, soon there will be a billion Content ID copyright claims every six months, which rounds to over two billion claims every year. To put that into perspective, if the world currently has five billion-odd internet users, that’s enough for 20% of the entire internet population to receive two copyright complaints per person, every 12 months.

    Coincidentally, reports suggest that YouTube has around two billion active users already.

    Takedown Notices Must be Reported

    The numbers above are enormous but since Content ID-claimed videos stay up, they don’t need to be reported to the European Commission, a requirement for large platforms under the EU’s fledging Digital Services Act.

    When Google and major online platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, plus others, restrict or take content offline in response to a takedown notice under Article 16 , clear information must be sent under Article 17 to affected users.

    Under Article 24 (5) , these so-called ‘statements of reasons’ must also be sent to the European Commission. Required information includes the legal basis for the complaint, the legal basis for taking the content down, and a myriad of additional details including a synopsis of considerations preceding takedowns.

    To ensure consistency, submitters use an API to file ‘statements of reasons’ (SOR) in the standardized format below.

    At the time of writing, just 16 large online platforms are required to supply the EC with this information. When things were just getting warmed up in December 2023, the volume of SOR notices sent by just five submitters had reached 25.8 million per week and when all submitters’ notices were combined, the all-time total topped 710 million.

    Things Have Moved On Since Then

    It’s almost impossible to reconcile the figures being reported this week with any type of normal thought process. The 710 million figure reported last December was close enough to compare with the population of Europe, 746 million, give or take, or one takedown per person on average.

    Over the past 24 hours especially but potentially longer, the EC system has been producing errors in response to our queries. A massive surge in reports filed by Google could be at least partly responsible.

    Over 14.4 billion SOR being reported to the Commission was unexpected, to say the least. The ‘statement of reasons’ dashboard appears to show Google taking unprecedented – and as far as we can determine – mostly voluntary action, against billions of listings on its Google Shopping platform and various non-compliant content on Google Play.

    Google may have submitted as many as 13.5 billion notices to the Commission thus far. From the few dozen we sampled relating to Google Shopping, many if not all cite terms of service violations committed by advertisers. Notices state that the removal was carried out as part of a voluntary initiative using automatic detection methods. We have seen examples where decisions are described as “Fully Automated” and others as “Not Automated.”

    Four typical examples from the sample are presented below. The ‘ground for decision’ is the same in all notices we were able to review: Content incompatible with terms and conditions . The explanations vary considerably.

    – There was a problem identified with the criteria used in your ads
    – One or more of your products have images with promotional text or obstructions
    – Google identified that some of your products contain adult-oriented content
    – Some of your products have generic images. Use images that clearly show the product

    Google statements – click to enlarge google-statements

    Whether this has anything (or nothing) to do with the antitrust case hanging over Google in Europe is unknown. After the European Commission (EC) found that Google had used its dominant position in search, to gain an unfair market advantage elsewhere, the EC hit Google with a €2.4 billion fine.

    Google challenged the EC at the EU Court of Justice but, in late 2021, its case was mostly dismissed and the Court confirmed the €2.4 billion fine. In an opinion released by EU Court of Justice Advocate General Juliane Kokott last month, the EU Court was advised to dismiss Google’s objections and uphold the fine.

    When attempting to pull more data on Thursday evening, the EC’s system continued to throw error after error as Google continuously filed new reports. Given the number of notices already on file, not to mention the errors when attempting to pull the maximum 1,000-item reports currently allowed, checking anything like a representative sample is impossible. However, every statement we were able to access followed similar formats to those shown above.

    Rightsholders Use DSA to Remove Apps from Google Play

    The billions of reports filed by Google include over 208,000 that appear in response to a search for Google Play + Apps, with no specified content category or reason.

    When filtering for intellectual property-related issues, over 2,800 reports indicate the removal of apps from Google Play, many listing ‘Copyright’ as the ‘legal ground relied on’.

    The pair of notices shown below are typical of those we were able to review, most if not all of which reference technical issues experienced by Google.

    Google statements – click to enlarge google play dsa takedowns

    In common with many of the others, the notices state that the apps were removed from Google Play in response to a “Notice submitted in accordance with Article 16 DSA” which in broad terms governs a DMCA-style takedown mechanism but applicable to a broader range of content.

    The EU system improves on the U.S. variant by requiring reasons to be published, but lags behind in a non-insignificant way by disallowing references to content and identification of the notice-sender, which critically undermines investigations into abuse.

    The EC’s Statement of Reasons transparency database is available here

    From: TF , for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

    • chevron_right

      EU accuses TikTok of failing to stop kids pretending to be adults

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Monday, 19 February - 17:43

    EU accuses TikTok of failing to stop kids pretending to be adults

    Enlarge (credit: Matt Cardy / Contributor | Getty Images Europe )

    The European Commission (EC) is concerned that TikTok isn't doing enough to protect kids, alleging that the short-video app may be sending kids down rabbit holes of harmful content while making it easy for kids to pretend to be adults and avoid the protective content filters that do exist.

    The allegations came Monday when the EC announced a formal investigation into how TikTok may be breaching the Digital Services Act (DSA) "in areas linked to the protection of minors, advertising transparency, data access for researchers, as well as the risk management of addictive design and harmful content."

    "We must spare no effort to protect our children," Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for Internal Market, said in the press release, reiterating that the "protection of minors is a top enforcement priority for the DSA."

    Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      EU will hold 3 major porn sites to same regulations as Meta, X

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Wednesday, 20 December - 15:06

    EU will hold 3 major porn sites to same regulations as Meta, X

    Enlarge (credit: ToolX via Getty Images)

    Three of the world’s biggest pornography sites will be hit with new regulatory curbs including stricter requirements on age verification, after EU regulators determined the adult platforms fell within the scope of a landmark law designed to police content online.

    Xvideos, Pornhub, and Stripchat will be from April subject to the obligations of “very large online platforms” under the Digital Services Act (DSA), according to three people familiar with the move.

    That designation applies to platforms with more than 45 million users and has so far been applied to tech groups such as Facebook, Wikipedia, and TikTok.

    Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Musk’s X hit with EU’s first investigation of Digital Services Act violations

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Monday, 18 December - 16:54 · 1 minute

    Illustration includes an upside-down Twitter bird logo with an

    Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | Chris Delmas)

    The European Union has opened a formal investigation into whether Elon Musk's X platform (formerly Twitter) violated the Digital Services Act (DSA), which could result in fines of up to 6 percent of global revenue. A European Commission announcement today said the agency "opened formal proceedings to assess whether X may have breached the Digital Services Act (DSA) in areas linked to risk management, content moderation, dark patterns, advertising transparency and data access for researchers."

    This is the commission's first formal investigation under the Digital Services Act, which applies to large online platforms and has requirements on content moderation and transparency. The step has been in the works since at least October, when a formal request for information was sent amid reports of widespread Israel/Hamas disinformation .

    The European Commission today said it "decided to open formal infringement proceedings against X under the Digital Services Act" after reviewing X's replies to the request for information on topics including "the dissemination of illegal content in the context of Hamas' terrorist attacks against Israel." The commission said the investigation will focus on dissemination of illegal content, the effectiveness of measures taken to combat information manipulation on X, transparency, and "a suspected deceptive design of the user interface."

    Read 6 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      YouTube, Facebook, & TikTok Won’t Discuss Bad Takedowns? Get Over It, They’re Busy

      news.movim.eu / TorrentFreak · Thursday, 7 December - 18:40 · 4 minutes

    stupidtv-l Back in August we reported how Google had received requests to remove one billion allegedly-infringing links from its search results. A billion is a big number, especially when it refers to takedown demands received over a period of just nine months .

    A few days before we published that report, Google had just processed its seven billionth removal request, having reached six billion less than a year earlier . At the time of writing, just four months after reaching seven billion, Google has already processed another 572,000,000 takedown demands.

    And that’s only Google search. Content ID claims alone reached 1.5 billion on YouTube in 2021 and that doesn’t account for all the removals carried out by Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X/Twitter, Snapchat and any other platform that springs to mind.

    The Situation is Bad and Getting Worse By the Day

    Under the Digital Services Act , large online platforms are required to keep the European Commission updated via so-called ‘statements of reasons’ which detail the circumstances behind the removal of every piece of content from their platforms. These reports are added to an EC database which is made available in the form of a continuously updated transparency report.

    For demonstration purposes we extracted all the reasons for removal cited by YouTube in one 24-hour period during the last week and found several related to copyright, including those detailed below.

    ⦿ Your video has been removed from YouTube for a Terms of Service violation because it is a copy of another video that was previously removed from YouTube due to a copyright removal request that we received.

    ⦿ Content that shows viewers how to gain unauthorized free access to audio content, audiovisual content, full video games, software, or streaming services that normally require payment is not allowed.

    ⦿ Due to multiple copyright strikes associated with the videos below, your YouTube channel has now been terminated. Copyright owners can choose to issue legal complaints that require YouTube to take down videos that contain their content. When you have 3 or more copyright strikes, your channel can be terminated.

    Other reasons for content deletion unrelated to copyright, and in some cases seemingly more complicated to determine via automated means, were in abundant supply. Those listed below represent just a small sample.

    Social media platform Facebook also reports huge numbers of takedowns to the EC. On the handful of days we extracted the company’s reports, data protection and privacy violations were very common, along with ‘scams and fraud’, ‘illegal or harmful speech’, and ‘pornography or sexualized content’, the latter often labeled ‘synthetic media’.

    Reasons For Removal Vary But All Platforms Are Staggeringly Busy

    Depending on the nature of the platform, the reasons for removing content can vary considerably. On the days we took samples, which may not necessarily be representative in a broader analysis, Amazon removed huge numbers of listings for copyright and trademark infringement, violations of electrical/packaging standards, fakes and scams, and general advertising policy violations. Overall, few if any violations were of a personal nature, however.

    TikTok, on the other hand, appears to spend a worrying amount of time removing content categorized as ‘Violent Behaviors and Criminal Activities’, ‘Harassment and Bullying’, ‘Hate Speech and Hateful Behaviors’, ‘Sexually Suggestive Content’, ‘Sexual Exploitation and Gender-Based Violence’, ‘Suicide and Self-Harm’ and well, you get the idea. What motivates users to act in this manner is best left to mental health specialists, but it seems that without TikTok’s constant moderation, the platform might be completely uninhabitable.

    That brings us back to the almost inevitable conclusion that at some point, few if any major platforms will have the resources to deal with abusive takedowns on an individual, human-powered basis, on any meaningful scale. The EU’s DSA ‘Statements of Reasons’ database shows why individual attention is likely to become even more scarce as major platforms deal with a seemingly endless tsunami of takedowns based on a growing list of alleged violations.

    Statements YouTube Facebook TikTok Play Store App Store Amazon
    2023-12-05 266,075 1,266,522 1,711,077 13,559 718 198,848
    2023-12-04 8,429 1,026,290 1,006,839 22,356 616 349,356
    2023-12-03 8,539 1,163,831 702,848 20,540 771 271,043
    2023-12-02 112,225 1,168,637 678,374 23,512 714 331,126
    2023-12-01 207,936 1,230,830 975,141 22,178 698 554,975
    2023-11-30 131,499 1,272,435 1,063,963 22,871 734 2,948,318
    2023-11-29 172,570 1,305,828 1,050,463 22,184 815 4,511,317
    7 Days 907,273 8,434,373 7,188,705 147,200 5,066 9,164,983

    When combined, YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, Google Play, Apple’s App Store and Amazon reported 25,847,600 takedowns for just one week , each with a statement explaining why the content was removed. But that’s only the beginning.

    To provide the full picture we would need to add AliExpress, Booking.com, Google Maps, Google Shopping, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pintrest, Snapchat, X/Twitter, and Zalando to the above.

    The numbers are big: 11,679,101 statements of reasons were added to the system on December 5 and another 15,519,304 on December 6. During the last week the smallest number of statements filed in a single day was 9,828,619. The image below shows the overall position as of this morning.

    EU-DSA-Statements

    Those curious to see for themselves can grab daily .csv files weighing in at 5GB/6GB each and containing nothing but text.

    After attempting to review just one of these files, it’s clear why YouTube struggles with disputes that can’t be handled by automation. AI will at some point provide something close to acceptable but until our artificial overlords can provide a credible fair use assessment or recognize when anti-piracy outfits are using crude word-based filters, copyright frustrations will continue as normal.

    From: TF , for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

    • chevron_right

      Google, Meta, TikTok defeat Austria’s plan to combat hate speech

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 9 November - 19:08

    Google, Meta, TikTok defeat Austria’s plan to combat hate speech

    Enlarge (credit: Matt Cardy / Contributor | Getty Images Europe )

    On Thursday, a top European court ruled that Austria cannot force Google, Meta, and TikTok to pay millions in fines if they fail to delete hate speech from their popular social media platforms.

    Austria had attempted to hold platforms accountable for hate speech and other illegal content after passing a law in 2021 requiring tech giants to publish reports as often as every six months detailing content takedowns. Like the European Union's recently adopted Digital Services Act, the Austrian law sought to impose fines—up to $10.69 million, Reuters reported —for failing to tackle illegal or harmful content.

    However, soon after Austria tried to enforce the law, Google, Meta, and TikTok—each with EU operations based in Ireland—challenged it in an Austrian court. The tech companies insisted that Austria's law conflicted with an EU law that says that platforms are only subject to laws in EU member states where they're established.

    Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Big Tech isn’t ready for landmark EU rules that take effect tomorrow

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 24 August, 2023 - 19:16

    Big Tech isn’t ready for landmark EU rules that take effect tomorrow

    Enlarge (credit: the_burtons | Moment )

    Tomorrow, the world's biggest tech companies will finally be confronted with a European Union law designed to change the Internet forever —requiring more transparency and accountability from companies operating large platforms like Meta, TikTok, X, Google, Apple, and Amazon than before.

    This landmark legislation, the Digital Services Act (DSA), could end up cornering platforms into making a difficult choice: either incur heavy fines or risk disrupting their core business models by making it easier than ever to opt out of recommendation systems. Repeat offenders could be banned from operating in the EU entirely.

    Today, as Reuters reported that platforms are bracing for this major change, the question remains: How prepared is the EU to actually enforce the DSA?

    Read 24 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Que risque un géant du net qui ne respecte pas le DSA ?

      news.movim.eu / Numerama · Thursday, 24 August, 2023 - 09:32

    géant du net gafa

    Le DSA (Digital Services Act) entre en vigueur pour les géants de la tech, avec des règles bien précises à respecter. Les enfreindre expose les grandes entreprises à des sanctions potentiellement très lourdes. [Lire la suite]

    Abonnez-vous aux newsletters Numerama pour recevoir l’essentiel de l’actualité https://www.numerama.com/newsletter/

    • chevron_right

      Tout comprendre au DSA : la loi européenne qui encadre les géants du web

      news.movim.eu / Numerama · Thursday, 24 August, 2023 - 06:09

    Après avoir transformé Internet avec le RGPD, l'Union européenne frappe encore plus fort avec le Digital Services Act, sa règlementation conçue pour encadrer les Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple ou TikTok. Le DSA fixe une multitude de nouvelles règles exigeantes, qui pourraient changer les grandes plateformes à tout jamais. [Lire la suite]

    Abonnez-vous aux newsletters Numerama pour recevoir l’essentiel de l’actualité https://www.numerama.com/newsletter/