• chevron_right

      How to Setup and Enable WhatsApp Proxy on Linux

      TREND OCEANS · Sunday, 15 January, 2023 - 10:37

    When you are cut off from your loved ones for an extended period of time, how do you think you will feel? I mean, it’s bad, right? To solve this problem, WhatsApp made a feature called “WhatsApp proxy,” which lets you talk to your loved ones even if the government blocks or disrupts the connection.

    Read More

    #linux #tools #web #ubuntu #docker #proxy #tech #whatsapp #socialmedia

    • chevron_right

      Social Media Vs Dating Agency or Coach Media

      preptorrent · pubsub.movim.eu / manosphere · Saturday, 4 September, 2021 - 16:00 edit · 7 minutes

    #MRA #MGTOW #Manosphere #RedPill #AltTech #SocialNetwork #SocialMedia

    Social Media is actually a broad brush and often misused term (to the point of misnomer). This is especially the case when an online data system model is called a social-network by misnomer when actually it is a content-network... and an example of this is YouTube. A content network can have video content primarily (such as YouTube being a video-network). Historically a person finds content they like (such as a HowTo video or a vlog blog by a person into a given activity like antiques or gardening) and then they get to know a few new people into those things and start a regular (or semi-regular) behaviour of interacting with them. So it is content first and then, if there is social behaviour, then that is later. It is not a social-network (despite protests) but it is a content-network.

    Facebook however is a social-network. On Facebook (which BTW replaced many a website such as friends-reunited, thereby absorbing its user-base of people), people initially found people who they already know and then sometimes look at what activities they are into (such as their holiday photos/videos or clubs they are into such as historical battle recreations or gardening clubs), and those activities are "content". Female Suicide Even if people now make all manner of business accounts on Facebook and try to do things the other way around whereby they make content and try to get new people into that group, they still cannot shake the original way of things Facebook went about it (as per the old Friends Reunited website). A similar but reverse situation is how googleplus was retrofitted onto YouTube trying to make it into a social-network (when really it is a content-network, and more specifically a video-network even if now you can add photos and so on). Google, via YouTube, even resigned itself to making the googleplus into a hobby webpage about content (HowTo videos such as gardening etc.) when googleplus flopped, and it was like the googlepages (googlesites) idea in a way (of making a blog as a one way stream of content first and interaction later, such as by RSS feed blog).

    The Facebook model has the potential for people to first socialise with those they know and then get a job done (finding a gardener) by a "friend-of-a-friend" (which is a metadata model). Some might think this would be counterproductive to meritocracy because people would want to go for best prices and brands in products and services, but remember that this is not Amazon recommended products we are talking about, but rather this is nepotism. That works historically. This lends itself not just to pure nepotism but also the fact that people are more likely to employ a person they already know.

    Don't be surprised if now and then you find State driven employment systems which drive unemployed people into blatant lies in workshops akin to a PUA (Pick-Up-Artist) pretending that things are not rigged and nepotism and corrupt, such as the family of the employee at the job service getting the jobs for the servicing of office equipment at the local government buildings.

    Such workshops attempt to panel beat you into thinking that it is your fault they have rigged jobs against you, as they pretend you'll get the job "fair and square" if you stand-up straight (like a PUA snake-oil salesman telling you to "hold frame" instead of being a hunk as a way to get a girlfriend as a potential mate to have kids with). The idea of organising your life in a different way to that which you currently use is often proposed and rings a bell like Jordan B Peterson's "Tidy your room" approach and “lobsters” talk. It is a "cope" and floundering and it is all a propaganda.

    The "manosphere scene" (a vague term which is really just a collection of ways of looking at old-MRA problems now that the old-MRA is pretty much gone) is a propaganda machine and, if you look hard enough, an intelligence network. This became so large a threat that it was infiltrated and put under supervision by the State who then replaced the words with new words ("manosphere" being one of them which nobody was particularly interested in using) and with words like "gynocentrism" and "cock carousel" (all State engineered and besides the point of what the old-MRA was looking to do).

    However the manosphere scene still has some functionality and understands pertaining areas of propaganda networks, intelligence networks and data models as per the difference between social-network and a content network in a website (or back-end be it run by app client-side or web-app in a browser such as a webpage).

    One of the important things that was done at the start was to model (in Unified Modelling Language, UML, for Object Oriented code) what a MGTOW is and what a MRA is. So this allows the more appropriate usage (and reverse engineering of gadgets) of different types of online software which affect people. That can not only be Facebook or YouTube but other websites, including Dating Agencies or those Dating coaching sites which often overlap with the PUA techniques (and sometimes kink websites that overlap with dating hook-up sites).

    The digital manosphere is dynamic and, within the first decade of the millennium, very quickly set about feasibility studies, and creating of graphical linear inequalities (akin to if then else statements) of what the old-MRA could do for its simple aims and what reaction people would give (including if it were to be bad so as to detect what works and what fails and what flotsam and jetsam exists after a demolition of it, as those are gadgets to reverse engineer).

    Breaking down domestic violence shelters to destroy the abuse scam is achievable and breaking down dating networks likewise can be done. We know for example the fetish networks are part of the psychological propagandas involved with those who do such work for the State.

    Social-Networks are part of that reverse oriented engineering where gadgets (or functionality) can be taken from one network, used in conjunction with another network like a content-network (even at greatly inefficient expense) so as to reveal spurious information from another network such as a dating network.

    The MRA has transformed into a Frankenstein or "the thing" or "the blob" which can gladly have chunks blown off to become a sunk cost at great expense, just to exploit some data from a different network.

    The manosphere are finding out who the people against the old-MRA are and who is close to them, and what their flaws are such as addictive behaviours.

    It is already known that they are vulnerable to their own propaganda such as becoming addicted to pornography they expose themselves to by snooping on the data of other people. They cannot admit they are wrong, and have a sense of entitlement to a job for its money and status including "virtue" (rather than being a better person) and that they feel they are owed for some damage in their life as they cannot admit it was their fault. Women in particular can be like that. Their "kinks" will never go away. They seek to control other people as they are not in control of themselves and also they plug the hollow in their life with their jobs and the apparent virtue and the money. They will be put under supervision. We have controlled them before in these ways and that means their boss was controlled as they are a liability for surrounding themselves with those people. People so weak are not what a person (e.g. of the "manosphere scene") wants on their side. Like people killing themselves working at firms like Marconi, there will always be those who turn to suicide, not as an attempt but to actual death. Troilism and other masochism or paraphilia are disorders and it is not the same as a good man taking multiple wives (as that is 'vanilla'). The people against the old-MRA can have these disorders (being vulnerable to it) and can be in denial of what they are (often using false equivalences) and they create an audit trails of it as per the above data models and networks described. They never admit their own fault or take blame and as such are vulnerable to disorders as with those.

    Fig: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Male-Female_suicide_ratios_2015_%28age-standardized%29.png