• Be chevron_right

      Contact publication

      pubsub.kikeriki.at / bearblog · Thursday, 23 December, 2021 - 21:30 · 3 minutes

    Following on from my post yesterday about an edge case in YouTube, I thought I’d write about a class of edge cases perhaps even more strange that I’ve been exploring recently:

    <p>Following on from <a href="drinking-from-the-firehose-youtube-music">my post yesterday about an edge case in YouTube</a>, I thought I’d write about a class of edge cases perhaps even more strange that I’ve been exploring recently:</p> <p>Search engines are a fact of daily life for most of the population nowadays. Google (sub your preferred provider) is an extension of the brain, imagined as giving you access to the sum of the world’s information at the click of a button. But a search engine isn’t just a Ctrl-F for the internet with a nice interface and ads; rather it’s a tremendously complicated system with lots of features and interactions between those features. And all you need to explore the system yourself is some well-tuned search queries.</p> <p>I recently had an epiphany: search engines are designed to find you results for <em>something</em> and that’s a job they perform well. But there’s nothing stopping you from searching for <em>nothing</em>! And the search engines will still give you results!</p> <p>And what results they are - have a go on the links below:</p> <p>An empty query on DDG: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%2B&quot;&quot;">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=+””</a><br /> A different empty query on DDG: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=(&quot;&quot;)">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=(“”)</a><br /> An empty query on Google: <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=(&quot;&quot;)">https://www.google.com/search?q=(“”)</a><br /> An empty query on Google News: <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%22&amp;tbm=nws">https://www.google.com/search?q=”“&amp;tbm=nws</a></p> <p>And have you ever thought about doing an <em>anything but</em> search? Normally you can add negations to the end of your search term to remove unwanted results, but there’s nothing stopping you from having a search term consisting entirely of negations!</p> <p>Here’s one on DDG: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=-&quot;an+entirely+negated+query&quot;">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=-“an entirely negated query”</a><br /> On Bing: <a href="https://www.bing.com/search?q=-%22an%2Bentirely%2Bnegated%2Bquery%22">https://www.bing.com/search?q=-“an entirely negated query”</a><br /> And on Google Books: <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=-%22nothing%2Bto%2Bsee%2Bhere%22&amp;tbm=bks">https://www.google.com/search?q=-“nothing to see here”&amp;tbm=bks</a></p> <h2 id="commentary">Commentary</h2> <p>Google appears to have some half-effective filtering for these empty search queries so you’ll mostly get the same two YouTube videos as a result - is this an Easter egg? Although Google News and Books don’t have any filter, and you do get some odd results there!</p> <p>DuckDuckGo doesn’t appear to have any filtering at all, although it’s obvious just how much DDG relies on Bing’s whitelabel product for its results by looking at how similar the two are.</p> <p>If you can think of a deeper reason for these results, please do leave a comment and lets try and explain some of the mystery away.</p>
    • Be chevron_right

      Contact publication

      pubsub.kikeriki.at / bearblog · Wednesday, 22 December, 2021 - 23:30 · 4 minutes

    Nowadays YouTube is a great place to listen to music, because everything is there. There’s such a wide selection of to listen to - seriously - the permissive ask-for-forgiveness1 bazaar means that if you search for it, it’ll be there. Make your own playlist, and when it’s time to add something new to you, it’ll be there. Alternatively, just be guided by the flow and don’t worry about where it’s all coming from. For all the perils of YouTube’s arbitrary Copyright system, the variety of music it allows is certainly a benefit. When videos are allowed by default, and the normal punishment after detection of your copyright infringement is a few cents from ads going to the labels, you get channels like ultradiskopanorama uploading rare classics that were never going to go on a service like Spotify. ↩

    <p>Nowadays YouTube is a great place to listen to music, because everything is there. There’s such a wide selection of to listen to - seriously - the permissive ask-for-forgiveness<sup id="fnref:1" role="doc-noteref"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote" rel="footnote">1</a></sup> bazaar means that if you search for it, it’ll be there. Make your own playlist, and when it’s time to add something new to you, it’ll be there. Alternatively, just be guided by the flow and don’t worry about where it’s all coming from.</p> <p>And to that point, discovery is where YouTube really excels - The Algorithm knows what genres you like, and what you’ve listened to before, and there’ll always be an old favourite ready to listen again or something new, but familiar, to experience for the first time. Training time is minimal, because The Algorithm is a simple beast really (do you really think AlphaGooYou is going to waste resources on a complex model).</p> <p>That said, sometimes you just want a change, and it’s hard to switch off completely. If you log out and clear your cookies, you’ll get music, sure; but it’ll be the worst dregs of contemporary nongenre, optimised for the dying radio sector. Not worth it! What you need is a quick way to jump out of your filter bubble: a random mode, a shuffle play, to say. And floating there in the aether, an odd edge case at the margins of the beast, it actually exists:</p> <p>Here it is, the snappily named: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=UUkeVFb3rrRYgcmcD1F8Bsag">“Uploads from Various Artists - Topic”</a> Playlist. 20000 entries, all songs just recently uploaded to YouTube in the past week or so. Go ahead: break into a brand new song with 0 lifetime views!, Enjoy a random cyrillic-lettered song you can’t understand!, Use it as an infinite radio - whole new songs being added faster than you can listen to them!</p> <p>Although I don’t completely understand why this exists, it seems to be a quirk in the YouTube partner music upload programme: music rightsholders (or those who purport to be) can upload music to YouTube<sup id="fnref:2" role="doc-noteref"><a href="#fn:2" class="footnote" rel="footnote">2</a></sup> in bulk and these are arranged into “Topic Channels” for each artist. These “Channels” inhabit the half-space between a real channel and a playlist - you can subscribe but there’s no real person on the other side of the curtain; certainly there’s no community there. And it seems, on one end or the other, that in the absence of any better information everything just gets unceremoniously dumped into the “Uploads from Various Artists - Topic” topic channel playlist.</p> <p>Either way, it may be quirk, and an odd one at that; but it’s fun and it should be saved. Please don’t take it away, oh wondrous BigTech…</p> <h2 id="footnotes">Footnotes</h2> <div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes"> <ol> <li id="fn:1" role="doc-endnote"> <p>For all the perils of YouTube’s arbitrary Copyright system, the variety of music it allows is certainly a benefit. When videos are allowed by default, and the normal punishment after detection of your copyright infringement is a few cents from ads going to the labels, you get channels like <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/ultradiskopanorama">ultradiskopanorama</a> uploading rare classics that were never going to go on a service like Spotify. <a href="#fnref:1" class="reversefootnote" role="doc-backlink">&#8617;</a></p> </li> <li id="fn:2" role="doc-endnote"> <p>These videos always have “Auto-generated by YouTube” in the description, and all have their comments turned off (sadly a recent change). <a href="#fnref:2" class="reversefootnote" role="doc-backlink">&#8617;</a></p> </li> </ol> </div>
    • chevron_right

      Quand Microsoft Teams s'affiche comme Skype, ou tantôt comme Chromium

      Mathias Poujol-Rost ✅ · Tuesday, 16 February, 2021 - 19:43

    https://upload.movim.eu/files/932f3ec89d91ccc293caf66588c2f8baec5cb7d5/zLlWw0gVjCHb/skype_chromium.png

    Dans la version Linux de cette application propriétaire, le son habituel de l'intervenant est présenté par l'OS Linux comme étant #Skype.

    Sauf les notification sonores de messages dans la discussion, utilisés par certains pour envoyer des extraits de texte ou des liens, évènement dans lequel le court son provoqué par l'envoi de message est présenté comme venant de #Chromium.

    Quitte à se baser sur un navigateur, étonnant que MS ne se soit pas basé sur #Edge, son nouveau nom pour Windows Internet Explorer.