• chevron_right

      Car feature subscriptions should be illegal, New Jersey legislators say

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Friday, 21 October, 2022 - 15:22 · 1 minute

    Car feature subscriptions should be illegal, New Jersey legislators say

    Enlarge

    One of the most egregious moneymaking trends in the auto industry today is the rise of the subscription feature. Sometimes, it's for software functions like navigation— Tesla recently announced that owners of cars will have to pay $99 per year or $9.99 per month to access navigation, maps, and voice commands once their cars reach a certain age, for example. And previously, BMW made headlines by making Apple CarPlay a subscription feature before backtracking in 2019 .

    But we're also starting to see automakers sell cars with built-in hardware features that must be activated through a subscription. Again, BMW is a notable example here; in markets like Korea and the United Kingdom, the company offers a subscription for features like heated seats. Tesla provides another example. It ships every car with the hardware required for its "Full Self Driving" feature but charges a fee—just increased from $12,000 to $15,000 in September —to activate it.

    Some legislators in New Jersey are unhappy about that business model. In late September, Assemblymen Paul Moriarty and Joe Danielsen introduced a bill that would prohibit car makers or dealers from offering subscriptions in New Jersey for any feature that uses hardware already installed on the vehicle at the time of purchase unless that feature would represent an ongoing expense to the dealer, manufacturer, or a third party.

    Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      New Jersey sues gas companies over climate change damages worth billions

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Wednesday, 19 October, 2022 - 18:05

    New Jersey sues gas companies over climate change damages worth billions

    Enlarge (credit: Serhej Calka | iStock / Getty Images Plus )

    This week, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin announced he had surveyed the state’s extreme weather damage caused by climate change and decided that it shouldn’t be residents or even the state shouldering “the enormous costs of rebuilding.”

    Filing a lawsuit in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Platkin—joined by the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs and the Department of Environmental Protection—suggested that this burden should belong to oil and gas companies. These companies, Platkin alleged in a press release , “knowingly made false claims to deceive the public about the existence of climate change and the degree to which their fossil fuels products have been [exacerbating] anthropogenic global warming.”

    Platkin’s lawsuit targets five major global oil and gas companies—ExxonMobil Corp., Shell Oil Co., Chevron Corp., BP Plc, and ConocoPhillips—and the trade group that all those companies belong to, the American Petroleum Institute (API). It’s similar, Platkin said in his press release, to lawsuits still pending in other states, including Rhode Island, Delaware, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Vermont.

    Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments