• chevron_right

      Canon plans to disrupt chipmaking with low-cost “stamp” machine

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Monday, 29 January - 14:22

    Canon’s FPA-1200NZ2C nanoimprint lithography machine. The company has been developing technology to stamp chip designs onto silicon wafers rather than etching them using light.

    Enlarge / Canon’s FPA-1200NZ2C nanoimprint lithography machine. The company has been developing technology to stamp chip designs onto silicon wafers rather than etching them using light. (credit: Canon)

    Canon hopes to start shipments of new low-cost chip-making machines as early as this year, as the Japanese company best known for its cameras and printers tries to undercut longtime industry leader ASML in providing the tools to make leading-edge semiconductors.

    The challenge from Canon comes as Western governments attempt to restrict China’s access to the most advanced semiconductor technologies and as global demand for chipmaking machines has soared. If successful, Canon’s “nanoimprint” technology could give back Japanese manufacturers some of the edge they ceded to rivals in South Korea, Taiwan and, increasingly, China over the past three decades.

    “We would like to start shipping this year or next year... we want to do it while the market is hot,” said Hiroaki Takeishi, head of Canon’s industrial group, who has overseen the development of the new lithography machines. “It is a very unique technology that will enable cutting-edge chips to be made simply and at a low cost.”

    Read 14 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Review: Framework’s Laptop 16 is unique, laudable, fascinating, and flawed

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Monday, 29 January - 11:35 · 1 minute

    The Framework Laptop 16.

    Enlarge / The Framework Laptop 16. (credit: Andrew Cunningham)

    Specs at a glance: Framework Laptop 16
    OS Windows 11 23H2
    CPU AMD Ryzen 7 7940HS (8-cores)
    RAM 32GB DDR5-5600 (upgradeable)
    GPU AMD Radeon 780M (integrated)/AMD Radeon RX 7700S (dedicated)
    SSD 1TB Western Digital Black SN770
    Battery 85 WHr
    Display 16-inch 2560x1600 165 Hz matte non-touchscreen
    Connectivity 6x recessed USB-C ports (2x USB 4, 4x USB 3.2) with customizable "Expansion Card" dongles
    Weight 4.63 pounds (2.1 kg) without GPU, 5.29 pounds (2.4 kg) with GPU
    Price as tested $2,499 pre-built, $2,421 DIY edition with no OS

    Now that the Framework Laptop 13 has been through three refresh cycles—including one that swapped from Intel's CPUs to AMD's within the exact same body—the company is setting its sights on something bigger.

    Today, we're taking an extended look at the first Framework Laptop 16, which wants to do for a workstation/gaming laptop what the Framework Laptop 13 did for thin-and-light ultraportables. In some ways, the people who use these kinds of systems need a Framework Laptop most of all; they're an even bigger investment than a thin-and-light laptop, and a single CPU, GPU, memory, or storage upgrade can extend the useful life of the system for years, just like upgrading a desktop.

    The Laptop 16 melds ideas from the original Framework Laptop with some all-new mechanisms for customizing the device's keyboard, adding and upgrading a dedicated GPU, and installing other modules. The result is a relatively bulky and heavy laptop compared to many of its non-upgradeable alternatives. And you'll need to trust that Framework delivers on its upgradeability promises somewhere down the line since the current options for upgrading and expanding the laptop are fairly limited.

    Read 52 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Review: Nvidia’s RTX 4070 Ti Super is better, but I still don’t know who it’s for

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 25 January - 12:30

    Of all of Nvidia's current-generation GPU launches, there hasn't been one that's been quite as weird as the case of the "GeForce RTX 4080 12GB."

    It was the third and slowest of the graphics cards Nvidia announced at the onset of the RTX 40-series, and at first blush it just sounded like a version of the second-fastest RTX 4080 but with less RAM. But spec sheets and Nvidia's own performance estimates showed that there was a deceptively huge performance gap between the two 4080 cards, enough that calling them both "4080" could have lead to confusion and upset among buyers.

    Taking the hint, Nvidia reversed course, " unlaunching " the 4080 12GB because it was "not named right." This decision came late enough in the launch process that a whole bunch of existing packaging had to be trashed and that new BIOSes with new GPU named needed to be flashed to the cards before they could be sold.

    Read 15 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Review: Radeon 7600 XT offers peace of mind via lots of RAM, remains a midrange GPU

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Wednesday, 24 January - 14:00 · 1 minute

    We don't need a long intro for this one: AMD's new Radeon RX 7600 XT is almost exactly the same as last year's RX 7600 , but with a mild bump to the GPU's clock speed and 16GB of memory instead of 8GB. It also costs $329 instead of $269, the current MSRP (and current street price) for the regular RX 7600.

    It's a card with a pretty narrow target audience: people who are worried about buying a GPU with 8GB of memory, but who aren't worried enough about future-proofing or RAM requirements to buy a more powerful GPU. It's priced reasonably well, at least—$60 is a lot to pay for extra memory, but $329 was the MSRP for the Radeon RX 6600 back in 2021. If you want more memory in a current-generation card, you otherwise generally need to jump up into the $450 range (for the 12GB RX 7700 XT or the 16GB RTX 4060 Ti) or beyond.

    RX 7700 XT RX 7600 RX 7600 XT RX 6600 RX 6600 XT RX 6650 XT RX 6750 XT
    Compute units (Stream processors) 54 (3,456) 32 (2,048) 32 (2,048) 28 (1,792) 32 (2,048) 32 (2,048) 40 (2,560)
    Boost Clock 2,544 MHz 2,600 MHz 2,760 MHz 2,490 MHz 2,589 MHz 2,635 MHz 2,600 MHz
    Memory Bus Width 192-bit 128-bit 128-bit 128-bit 128-bit 128-bit 192-bit
    Memory Clock 2,250 MHz 2,250 MHz 2,250 MHz 1,750 MHz 2,000 MHz 2,190 MHz 2,250 MHz
    Memory size 12GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6 16GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6 12GB GDDR6
    Total board power (TBP) 245 W 165 W 190 W 132 W 160 W 180 W 250 W

    The fact of the matter is that this is the same silicon we've already seen. The clock speed bumps do provide a small across-the-board performance uplift, and the impact of the extra RAM does become apparent in a few of our tests. But the card doesn't fundamentally alter the AMD-vs-Nvidia-vs-Intel dynamic in the $300-ish graphics card market, though it addresses a couple of the regular RX 7600's most glaring weaknesses.

    Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      I’ve used a foldable laptop for a month, and I’m ready to return to a clamshell

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 14 December - 12:20 · 1 minute

    HP Spectre Fold

    Enlarge / Reflective screens and creases aren't the only concerns with foldable PCs. (credit: Scharon Harding)

    Specs at a glance: HP Spectre Foldable 17-cs0097nr
    Screen 17-inch 1920×2560 OLED touchscreen
    OS Windows 11 Home
    CPU Intel Core i7-1250U
    RAM 16GB LPDDR5-5200
    Storage 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
    Networking Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3
    Ports 2x Thunderbolt 4
    Size (folded) 10.91×7.53×0.84 inches
    Weight (with keyboard) 3.58 lbs
    Battery 94.3 Wh
    Warranty 1 year
    Price (MSRP) $5,000
    Other HP Rechargeable MPP2.0 Tilt Pen, Bluetooth keyboard, and HP Envy USB-C Hub included

    Although foldable smartphones have been available for five years , the devices are still trying to justify themselves. And after using a foldable-screen laptop as my primary PC for about four weeks, I'm not sure they're ready for prime time.

    I'm leaving my time with HP's first foldable laptop with a sense of anticipation for the future of laptops, which I think would benefit from a resurgence of creative ideas that cater to the unique ways people use their computers. But I seriously question if the benefits of having a 17-inch screen in a 12-inch laptop body are worth the trade-offs inherent in today's foldable PCs .

    Early participants in the foldable laptop world have an opportunity to define the space, while consumers can decide if this is something they even want. HP's foldable is the most beefed-up option ever, and weeks of use have shown me a lot about what I want and don't want to see when the dust settles.

    Read 44 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Review: Apple’s 16-inch M3 Max MacBook Pro crams Ultra-level speed into a laptop

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Monday, 6 November - 14:00

    Apple's 16-inch, M3 Max-powered MacBook Pro.

    Enlarge / Apple's 16-inch, M3 Max-powered MacBook Pro. (credit: Andrew Cunningham)

    The next year or two will be a turning point for people who bought into the last few generations of Intel Macs. AppleCare+ subscriptions are going to expire, batteries will begin to lose a noticeable amount of capacity, software updates and security fixes will gradually dry up , and normal wear-and-tear will slowly take its toll.

    Every new generation of Apple Silicon Mac is another opportunity for Apple to get those people to update. Which may or may not help to explain why Apple is introducing its new M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max MacBook Pros less than 11 months after releasing the M2 versions.

    Like the early 2023 MacBook Pros, these late 2023 models are iterative improvements to the 2021 redesigns . They keep the things that made those laptops such a big improvement over the late-model Intel MacBook Pros while adding just a little more performance and one or two other minor improvements to entice people who still haven't made the Apple Silicon switch.

    Read 38 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Review: Framework Laptop finally gets an AMD Ryzen config—and it’s pretty good

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Tuesday, 3 October, 2023 - 14:48 · 1 minute

    Specs at a glance: Framework Laptop 13 (2023)
    OS Windows 11 22H2
    CPU AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (8-cores)
    RAM 32GB DDR5-5600 (upgradeable)
    GPU AMD Radeon 780M (integrated)
    SSD 1TB Western Digital Black SN770
    Battery 61 WHr
    Display 13.5-inch 2256x1504 non-touchscreen in glossy or matte
    Connectivity 4x recessed USB-C ports (2x USB 4, 2x USB 3.2) with customizable "Expansion Card" dongles, headphone jack
    Price as tested $1,679 pre-built, $1,523 DIY edition with no OS included

    The Framework Laptop 13 is back again.

    My third review of this laptop is probably the one that I (and many Framework-curious PC buyers) have been the most interested to test, as the company has finally added an AMD Ryzen option to the repair-friendly portable. Updates to the Intel version of the Framework Laptop have boosted CPU performance, but its graphics performance has been at a standstill since the Framework Laptop originally hit the scene in mid-2021.

    Even AMD's latest integrated graphics won't make a thin-and-light laptop a replacement for a gaming PC with dedicated graphics, but a bit more GPU power makes the Framework Laptop that much more versatile, making it easier to play games at reasonable resolutions and settings than it is on Intel's aging Iris Xe graphics hardware.

    Read 29 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      iPhone 15 and 15 Pro review: The final form

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Friday, 29 September, 2023 - 15:31

    iPhone 15, iPhone 15 Plus, iPhone 15 Pro, and iPhone 15 Pro Max lined up on a table

    Enlarge / From left to right: iPhone 15, iPhone 15 Plus, iPhone 15 Pro, and iPhone 15 Pro Max. (credit: Samuel Axon)

    It’s been six years since the iPhone X hit store shelves, but at a glance, 2023’s iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Pro aren't all that different. Thanks to a few steps of iteration, though, these smartphones still feel like a big step up—maybe not compared to last year’s iPhone, but certainly compared to 2017's, or even 2020’s.

    Though I don’t have any insight into what’s coming next year, the iPhone 15 seems like the final form of a product that has gone through a multi-year cycle. It sees Apple cementing a likely long-term strategy of treating the cheaper model as a rerun of the previous year’s pro model, it addresses one of the longest-standing complaints about iPhones (even if Apple’s hand was forced by regulation), and it refines a tried-and-true design.

    The iPhone 15, its pricier siblings, and its strong competitors on the Android side make the case that for better or worse (mostly better), we’ve reached peak smartphone.

    Read 75 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      macOS 14 Sonoma: The Ars Technica review

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Tuesday, 26 September, 2023 - 17:08 · 1 minute

    macOS 14 Sonoma: The Ars Technica review

    Enlarge

    I was preparing to write an intro calling macOS Sonoma—version 14.0 of Apple's desktop operating system, for those of you who can't keep the ever-lengthening list of California codenames straight—a "low-key" or "small" release. Because it definitely feels that way, and it's tempting to think that Apple is taking it easy on new features for older OSes because it's devoting so much internal time to VisionOS and the Vision Pro.

    But looking back, I've said something along those lines for each of the last few macOS releases (and several others before that). Honestly, these days, what macOS update hasn't been "low-key"? Every one since Big Sur (11.0) overhauled the UI and added Apple Silicon support has been content to add a few pieces on top of the foundation, fiddle a bit with under-the-hood enhancements and new security measures, maintain feature parity with iOS for the built-in apps, and call it a day. That's what Sonoma does, too.

    So macOS Sonoma is a perfectly typical macOS release, a sort of " Ventura -plus" that probably has one or two additions that any given person will find useful but which otherwise just keeps your Mac secure and avoids weird iCloud compatibility problems with whatever software is running on your phone. You probably don't need to run out and install it, but there's no real reason to avoid it if you're not aware of some specific bug or compatibility problem that affects the software you use. It's business as usual for Mac owners. Let's dive in.

    Read 243 remaining paragraphs | Comments