• chevron_right

      5 Google Alternatives That Don’t Suck

      pubsub.dcentralisedmedia.com / LifehackerAustralia · Wednesday, 3 February, 2021 - 22:38 · 2 minutes

    Google’s search engine has become a verb in the same way as ‘hoovering’ became a synonym for vacuuming and ‘Breville’ became the term for a toasted sandwich. But with the current tensions building between Google and news providers in Australia threatening the very availability of Google search in the country, folks are having to now consider what alternatives exist.

    Here are a few.

    DuckDuckGo

    duckduckgo.jpg?auto=format&fit=fill&q=80&w=1280&nrs=40

    I’ve looked at DuckDuckGo before. Its big benefit over Google is that it is very privacy focussed.

    Getting it to limit results to Australia is interesting – it does a poor job at that. But for the majority of searches, it works just fine. I tend to use the “site:” option a lot to find data at specific places as it works more effectively than the search tools on most web sites.


    Bing

    bing.jpg?auto=format&fit=fill&q=80&w=1280&nrs=40

    If nothing else, Microsoft’s Bing looks a lot prettier than Google and most of the others.

    Although it’s not privacy focussed, you can tweak the preferences so the ads you see are better targeted and it also boasts its own mobile apps for iOS and Android. Additionally, Microsoft has openly stated they have no problem with the proposed news media bargaining code.


    Search Encrypt

    search-encrypt.jpg?auto=format&fit=fill&q=80&w=1280&nrs=40

    If privacy is what you want, then Search Encrypt is worth a look.

    It takes online tracking prevention seriously by blocking online trackers and using local encryption to secure your searches. It uses AES-256 bit encryption with Secure Sockets Layer encryption so your searches and other web activities are secure as well as hiding them from other users who have access to your computer.


    Wolfram Alpha

    wolfram-alpha.jpg?auto=format&fit=fill&q=80&w=1280&nrs=40

    Back in the old days, search engines worked by having humans curate content rather than spidering the web and caching lots of content. Wolfram Alpha uses a combination of curation with a mathematical model that generates search results that are computational facts.

    For example, if I look up “Australia”, rather than getting a list of websites about our country, I get a bunch of data about Australia; things like land mass, population and demographic information.


    Start Page

    startpage.jpg?auto=format&fit=fill&q=80&w=1280&nrs=40

    While Google’s search results are often considered the best, people are concerned about being tracked by the search giant. Start Page pays Google to access its results but strips away all the trackers.

    So, you get great search results without having your search history become a tool to track you and target you with ads. And, it also includes the “Anonymous View” feature. If you click on a search result you can visit the site in full privacy. The sire will never know you were there. You’ll find the feature next to every search result.

    This article has been updated since its original publish date.

    The post 5 Google Alternatives That Don’t Suck appeared first on Lifehacker Australia .

    • chevron_right

      Une critique qui ne chercherait pas à juger, mais à faire exister une œuvre

      Jean VOGUET · pubsub.movim.eu / acousmatic-physis-tekhne · Sunday, 29 March, 2020 - 18:54 edit · 1 minute

    « Je ne peux m’empêcher de penser à une critique qui ne chercherait pas à juger, mais à faire exister une œuvre, un livre, une phrase, une idée ; elle allumerait des feux, regarderait l’herbe pousser, écouterait le vent et saisirait l’écume au vol pour l’éparpiller. Elle multiplierait non les jugements, mais les signes d’existence ; elle les appellerait, les tirerait de leur sommeil. Elle les inventerait parfois ? Tant mieux, tant mieux.

    La critique par sentence m’endort ; j’aimerais une critique par scintillements imaginatifs. Elle ne serait pas souveraine ni vêtue de rouge. Elle porterait l’éclair des orages possibles. »

    Michel Foucault, 1980

    A critic who does not seek to judge, but to make a work exist...

    « I can't help thinking of a critic who would not try to judge, but to make a work, a book, a sentence, an idea exist; she would light fires, watch the grass grow, listen to the wind and grab the foam in flight and scatter it. She would multiply not the judgments, but the signs of existence; she would call them, pull them out of their sleep. Would she ever make them up ? Good, good, good.

    Sentenced criticism puts me to sleep ; I'd like a criticism by imaginative sparkles. She wouldn't be sovereign or dressed in red. She would wear the lightning bolt of possible storms. »

    Michel Foucault, 1980

    #Foucault #critic #work #critique #œuvre